Search for:
Home
This Month
Editorial
Contact Lenses and Silicone Allergy
more
Meeting Synopsis
ARVO Synopsis Part 2
>
more
Posters
Lactoferrin Uptake Kinetics on SiH and Conventional Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials
more
In The Practice
Hypersensitivity with Silicone Hydrogels: Material or Solution Effect? more
Tell a friend
Home
About Us
Affiliates
Contact Us
Disclaimer
Site Map

 

Quick Vote:
When refitting conventional wearers with silicone hydrogels, how frequently do you encounter possible hypersensitivity to either the materials or a material / solution combination? click

 

Would you like to subscribe to our monthly newsletter?   click
 
This site is partially funded through an unrestricted educational grant from CIBA Vision

 
Posters
April 2003

 

CONTACT LENS-OCULAR SURFACE INTERACTIONS IN SUPERIOR EPITHELIAL ARCUATE LESIONS (SEALS)

Nicole O’Hare, Fiona Stapleton, Thomas Naduvilath, Isabelle Jalbert, Deborah F. Sweeney, Brien A. Holden Cooperative Research Center for Eye Research and Technology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

 

Purpose:

Cases and controls were compared to determine contact lens (CL)-ocular surface interactions associated with SEALS in high Dk extended wear (EW).

Method:
Seventeen cases of SEALS were matched to 17 controls for age, sex, duration of high Dk EW, refraction, and wear schedule. High Dk CL wear experience ranged from 3 to 24 months at the time of analysis. Fitting and surface characteristics of the CLs, measured at regular intervals, were compared between cases and controls during the period of EW. These selected variables were also compared for the SEALS cases at the time of the event to their respective prior-to-event phase. At a single visit, CL cytology using the habitual CL was performed. Corneal epithelial cells were harvested from the back surface of the CL, stained, and counts determined.
Results:
Wettability was slightly but not statistically significantly lower, (1.8 ± 0.6 versus 2.0 ± 0.4, p=0.09) and horizontal centration was better (0.0 ± 0.1mm versus 0.1 ± 0.1mm, p=0.01) for the SEAL cases than the controls over the period of EW. At the time of the event, tightness was higher (49 ± 6% versus 45 ± 9%, p=0.06) and primary gaze movement was lower (0.2 ± 0.1mm versus 0.3 ± 0.2mm, p=0.04) than the respective prior-to-event phase for the SEAL cases. Higher numbers of corneal epithelial cells were recovered from SEALS cases compared to controls (p<0.01).
Conclusions:

Subjects with poorer wettability and tighter fitting CLs seem to be more likely to develop SEALS in these types of materials. Interaction between the corneal epithelium and the lens back surface, evidenced by corneal epithelial cell recovery, appeared to be more pronounced in the SEALS cases. As SEALS appears to be full thickness, ‘mechanical’ lesions, these results suggest the hypothesis that ‘shear’ forces leading to excessive disruptive interaction with the ocular surface are exacerbated by poor wettability and tight fittings.

Download PDF of Poster:
CONTACT LENS-OCULAR SURFACE INTERACTIONS IN SUPERIOR EPITHELIAL ARCUATE LESIONS (SEALS) - 212kb
You will need Version 4 or later of Adobe Acrobat Reader to view some documents on this site. You can get the latest version from the Adobe Home site. 

 

 
All rights reserved, copyright 2002 - 2007 siliconehydrogels.org